Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 135deg cable

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>, "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 135deg cable
From: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 22:38:56 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pete Smith" <n4zr@contesting.com>

>> >    2. if the line length is any multiple of exactly 90 degrees, its
>> phase delay is the same as its electrical length and the phase delay
>> > is not dependent on the VSWR on the line.
>> >
>> >
>>I don't think this is true. My old memory says the length is 180 deg.
>>
>>73, Roger
>
>
> You're right.  On page 11-7 of the current edition of the ON4UN book, Fig.
> 11-6 charts phase shift vs line length for various load mismatches.  For a
> given mismatch the phase error appears greatest at 90 degrees and zero 
> only
> at 0 and 180 degrees.
>
> 73, Pete N4ZR
>

Pete,

Figure 11-6 shows the "current phase shift" of a 50 ohms line
versus electrical length for 3 cases (1 matched, 2 different
mismatches). This is equivalent to ANGLE (Iout | Iin). With
the 90 degree line ANG (Iout | In) <> 90 deg is VSWR <> 1.0,
but ANG (Iout | Vin) = 90 deg for any load impedance. See
paragraph 3.4.5 on W7EL "Current Forcing" properties of 90
degree lines.

73, Mike W4EF........................................


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>