ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:33:48 -0500, "Robert Chudek - K0RC"
<k0rc@citlink.net> wrote:
>Well why not just split the "risk"?
>
>Prepare an agreement where the homeowner and ham split either the increase or
>decrease in property value? When the property value increases, it's a win-win
>situation! You could even sell that paper and buy a better rig.
------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
Why not? Because from the neighbor's point of view, the upside "risk"
belongs to him 100% anyway, and the downside "risk" should be all
yours, not half his.
It's just how people are, right or wrong.
Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|