I would just like to relate a story on the HDBX 48 that I have had up for about
20 years. The tower was OK for the first 15 years or so, with a little rust
showing up around the 10Th year. The bolts that join the sections together were
the first to rust, with a little rust showing up on the edges of the X's and
the vertical rails(all of which were sheared and formed after galvanizing). At
the 15th year I noticed in that winter that the tower top was moving in the
heavy winds a lot more than I remembered. Next big wind storm I b raves the
storm to go out and watch the tower react to the gusts. I discovered that the
tower was lose between sections 2 and 3. I had installed all bolts according to
Rohn's directions and even used a torque wrench to verify tightness. After wind
died down I was able to climb tower and found out that the bolt holes on two
sides had elongated by almost a quarter inch and that the third side had the
section of the leg below the second had completely
broken off from the midpoint of the bolt down. So all I could think of to do
was to place a guy wire (using a cable with a hook on the end of it so I didn't
have to climb beyond the break) on the top of the next section and apply enough
force to keep the tower from rocking and doing more damage. Now I have a
useless tower that I can't get down with a gin pole and I can't think of a way
to get it down besides just cutting it loose and toppling down. That would
destroy antenna and with my luck the rotor too. I might be able to erect a 25g
tower with temporary guys to use as a tower crane. Access with a real crane
truck is difficult and not within my ham budget at this time. As to the
aluminum rivets I was very surprised when I got the tower here and found
dissimilar metals on it. I am still surprised to find that they have not been a
source of rust over the almost 20 years I have had the tower. They must be of a
alloy that I have not heard about, or they might be mixing
aluminum with the zink they galvanize with.
Now about the Mosley antennas, I have not had the TA versions but have had
the CL-36's for almost thirty years and other than needing a boom truss system
added for my higher than normal wind location and a little more drupe on the
elements than other brands, they have preformed well and been mechanically
secure all the while. The other fellow that mentioned that the driver seemed
longer that the reflector is due to the feed system they use. Their patented
balanced feed is a version of the T match that uses a made up series capacitor
to feed each side of the insulated split driven element. The capacitor consists
of a length of 15 kv rated wire inside of the element halves tied to the center
of the feed connector. Its this series capacitor that necessitates a longer
than quarter wave element halves to get back to resonance.(forming a electrical
1/4 length) While this capacitor value is a compromise for triband use, it sure
makes a clean looking installation with all the
components inside the element away from the weather. I'm not trying to say
this antenna is better than monobanders of the same length, but it is a good
balance of the compromises one has to make with a tribander.(and maybe a better
balance that they were able to achieve with the more modern designs they are
selling now!)(all those duel drivers and the phasing lines are not enough
improvement to justify their complexity and weather survivability.
Nick
WB7PEK
Dodging lightning somewhere on a hilltop in SW WA
____________________________________________________________________________________Luggage?
GPS? Comic books?
Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&cs=bz
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|