Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] re Ask the experts

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] re Ask the experts
From: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 23:24:37 +0000
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hi Dick,

I must say that I have never seen the yagi evaluation report, but I did get 
the one for verticals.  I had put up a Gap Titan.  I was getting signal 
reports on 40 meters of 10 db over S9 running 1 kw with it.  This was in 
2001 when I returned to the air after being QRT for 18 years.  I thought 10 
dB over 9 was pretty good, not having anything else to compare it to.  Then 
I put up a center fed zepp with ladder line and balanced tuner and that was 
15 dB better than the Titan.  Then I turned the center fed zepp into a 2 
lambda horizontal loop and added another 10 dB over the zepp.  The Titan 
became a backup antenna, mostly unused.  I got and read the K7LXC vertical 
evaluation report.  The Titan didn't fair very well in it.  There were a few 
bands on which it was so so.   These reports compare each antenna to a 
simple reference antenna on a range where field strength measurements are 
made.  This is about the only way to really evaluate an antenna.   From my 
experience, I urge you to get the beam report, read it, and based on what it 
says, try another beam if you wish to.  You may be glad you did, depending 
on exactly what it says and/or what kind of operating you do.   Generally, 
we desperately need more of these evaluations--they are the only serious ham 
antenna reviews I know of that can be relied upon.  ARRL would do everyone a 
favor if they spent some of their money on doing these kinds of evaluations, 
instead of their somewhat subjective reviews.  The problem is most ham 
antennas work just enough to make us think they're okay.  I was "satisfied" 
with my Gap vertical when it was my only antenna and I had not done any A/B 
tests with something else.

<<<This "Mosley Bashing" has finally hit my button !!
I have a PRO-57A and am very satisfied with it. It
is my understanding that subsequent models were
"improved". I have not seen any published data from
verifiable sources except those peddling their
"comparisons" which I don't intend to pay for.

Not every ham has the real estate to put up Mono-
Banders on Sky-Needles, so, as it is in life, one
must make compromises. But I cannot accept that the
PRO-57A is that bad, not without proof.>>>

Translation:  I want proof but I'm not paying for it.
Good luck with that one.

73,

rob / k5uj

_________________________________________________________________
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TowerTalk] re Ask the experts, Rob Atkinson, K5UJ <=