Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] permit in hand

To: "Kelly Johnson" <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com>, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] permit in hand
From: "bill rubin" <brubin2010@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:49:12 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
thats wrong, why should the HAM comunity accept unreasonable government?
Whats reason for FCC PRB-1 ?  We have rights and we need to stand up for
them !!
Bill


On 8/31/07, Kelly Johnson <n6kj.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Accept it and move on.  Most of us out here would never get a 90'
> tower OK'd.  You're lucky!
>
>
> On 8/31/07, bill rubin <brubin2010@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well I finally got the permit for a 90' tower. But not without issues
> and
> > additional expense.   My local zoning office  seems to believe that
> Rohn's
> > specs. or TIA-222 standard are not good enough. nor is a PE Stamp on a
> > letter saying the design provide is complaint.  They required each page
> of
> > the spec. have a PE Stamp.
> >
> > Cost $250
> >
> > Fedex info 3 times about $50
> >
> > Also my site plan needed a surveyors stamp.  A retired surveyor came out
> > looked. measured my house to road and driveway and said ok
> >
> > Cost $100.
> >
> > Additional Cost to project $400
> >
> > Was it excessive per PRB-1, yes as far as i am concerned, but to fight
> it it
> > would have cost me more than $400 in legal fees and more time on the
> project
> > with winter months ahead.
> >
> > So thats the update.
> >
> > 73's Bill N1HWC
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>