Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Full Size Moxon is Up

To: "'Ron Chambers'" <rwchambers@gmail.com>, "'David Gilbert'" <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Full Size Moxon is Up
From: "Tim Duffy K3LR" <k3lr@k3lr.com>
Reply-to: k3lr@k3lr.com
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:02:35 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Congrats Ron! You will really like this antenna!

We used a stack of these antennas during the past 4 DX contests for our 40
meter second station and they worked great!

For those wanting the conversion document (CushCraft XM-240 to W6NL -
Moxon), it is available on http://www.k3lr.com Click on STATION ENGINEERING
- then 1st topic.

73!
Tim K3LR

-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ron Chambers
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:38 PM
To: David Gilbert
Cc: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Full Size Moxon is Up

Full-size Moxon is finally up and installed on the KC5FU Contest Station
Multiplier Tower.

I think some of you had questions after it went up, but I don't recall who?

Ron/N5QQ




On 10/18/07, Ron Chambers <rwchambers@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This weekend or maybe next, we (N5QQ/W5WW) should have Dave Leeson's 2
> elem 40m MOXON up and running. Will offer our comments afterwards. K5MR
> got his up a few months back and seems to be pleased, well, until the
> lightning storm fried his rotor!
>
> More later...
>
> Ron
> N5QQ
>
>
>  On 10/17/07, David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Force 12's own website says their more recent coil-loaded Delta 240 is
> > intended to replace the older linear loaded EF-240S, their explanation
> > being:
> >
> > "The most difficult aspect of the antenna was tuning the elements to the
> > proper frequencies for maximum performance.  This is because the linear
> > loading had variances during assembly."    see
> > http://force12inc.com/F12-Delta-240-140-Info-1.htm
> >
> > Several reviews on eHam.net additionally report problems with the stiff
> > Alum-O-Weld loading wires/**/ breaking, so I suspect that also had some
> > impact on F12's decision to create the Delta 240.  In theory, the Delta
> > 240 is similar to the OptiBeam OB2-40 (the choice I made as well), but
> > the Delta 240 elements are a bit shorter and I'm sure the OptiBeam is
> > more ruggedly built.
> >
> > Dave   AB7E
> >
> >
> >
> > john@kk9a.com wrote:
> > > I'm not sure that linear loading is as efficient as some manufactures
> > claim
> > > and some models require a lot of adjusting of the linear loading wires
> > for
> > > the antenna to perform properly.  I personally prefer a loading coil
> > and
> > > when looking for a small 2el beam for P40A, I choose the OptiBeam
> > OB2-40.
> > > The coils are massive, the antenna is well constructed and easy to put
> >
> > > together.   My second choice (actually first choice if budget ruled
> > out the
> > > OptiBeam) would be the Cushcraft XM240.
> > >
> > > John KK9A
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>