I had an interesting experience with Faraday Cages, Screen Rooms at the Navy
School, Monterey, in 1986.
We needed one in an Oceanography Computing Research Lab, and the Public Works
department took a bunch
of stored, bolt together Screen Room panels that had wooden frames inside, and
double surfaces of fine copper mesh screen. The panels were
6 each, forming a cage about 15ft long, by 8 ft by 8ft. They had large filters
of the AC mains that filtered incoming and outgoing RF
to the cage. The cage panels had long, bolted clamps that pressed the
panels together on the edges, insuring firm (?) contact between panel edges of
the fine mesh screen. The panels wee
old, in storage for some years, and the copper screens had a uniform patina of
brown, copper oxide.
The door must have been expensive, precision constructed, with a brass/copper
structure, and close fitting phosphor-bronze finger stock firmly compressed
around the complete door frame when it was closed.
As a first check of effectiveness after they bolted the screen room together, I
took a battery powered AM/FM table radio inside and closed the door, and it
played almost perfectly, Both AM and FM, with little attenuation. HUH?! We
worked for some time to get it RF tight, and found that the devil is in the
details on assembly...
Turns out that the "patina" on the copper, and simple clamping the frames
together, produced very leaky joints, that had to be worked on
extensively (cleaned and tightly clamped) to get them to be RF sealed. The door
frame surfaces also had to be burnished to bright metal to get a good RF tight
seal.
73,
All the best,
Pat Barthelow (916) 315-9271
Jamesburg Moonbounce Team
aa6eg@hotmail.com
> To: xdavid@cis-broadband.com; sanorm@columbus.rr.com
> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 13:03:25 -0400
> From: warrenwolff@aol.com
> CC: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Faraday Cage
>
> Hi again folks,
>
> Wow, I surely do stir up a hornet's nest when I pose some of my
> questions to this group.
>
> This subject of a Faraday?Shielded Room came up when I was
> trying to get this new house as protected as possible.? The almighty
> dollar interfered with some of my thoughts, this being one of them.
>
> I was suspecting that a bit less than 1/4 wave at 2 meters would have
> been sufficient for such a room.
>
> Now David has dug up a reference:
>
>
> - Aperture
> Aperture
> An opening in a shielded enclosure that may become the source of leakage for
> electromagnetic energy. This is
>
> most common in joints, seams and penetrations such as switches, connectors,
> and lamps/LEDs. Typically, the
>
> maximum dimension of an aperture should be less than 1/20 wavelength of the
> highest frequency of interest in
>
> order to avoid emissions.
>
> Interesting, to say the least.
>
> The comments re: air conditioning resurrected an old experience(s).? When I
> was an OIC of a STRATCOM
> Receiver Site in Hawaii, we had a all copper screen room.? As Program Manager
> of a Comm System in
> Kuwait, we also had one.? In both cases, we did not close the door unless
> absolutely necessary because
> of poor air conditioning.
>
> Then it hit me; my project engineer from USAF days has a PhD in Physics.?
> Think I will
> ask him if 1/20 or 1/10 is overkill.? The idea of something less than the
> tightly closed
> copper mesh room still intrigues me - - IF the spacing is not too small.?
> Doorways and
> A/C ducts probably pose the biggest problem to a "cheapo" room.
>
> I appreciate all of the interest and the well-founded references provided so
> far.
>
> Warren; W7WY
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|