Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] [YCCC] Low-Band Rx Antenna vs. 4-square?

To: <yccc@contesting.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] [YCCC] Low-Band Rx Antenna vs. 4-square?
From: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@ARRL.NET>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 21:52:47 +0000
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Yes, the pattern of a Beverage can be better than a 4-square, also the
polarization is different.  There are times when the 4-square is better than
the Beverages here, but other times when the Beverages are definitely
better.


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Brock-Fisher [mailto:barockteer@aol.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 21:40
> To: yccc@contesting.com; towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: [YCCC] Low-Band Rx Antenna vs. 4-square?
> 
> I have a question which needs to be answered to figure out some
> filtering/switching schemes.
> 
> 
> 
> Would a low-band directional receive antenna, such as a Beverage or a
> Flag/Pennant, ever be better on receive than an already-directional
> transmit antenna, such as a  4-square or phased loops? Question applies to
> 160, 80m, 40m.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Tony, K1KP
> _______________________________________________
> YCCC Reflector mailto:yccc@contesting.com
> Yankee Clipper Contest Club  http://www.yccc.org
> Reflector Info: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/yccc



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>