Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 43' verticals

To: Michael Ryan <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 43' verticals
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:45:16 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Michael Ryan wrote:
> One of the older ARRL Antenna Books had an interesting article some years
> about about a helically wound 160 vertical, wound around a 4" or 6" ( I
> think ) PVC pipe about 20ft or so high.  Looked like a lot of fun but never
> got 'around to it."  - Mike
> 

Helically loaded antennas have been around a long time, and keep popping 
  up (see, e.g. the Univ of Rhode Island guy)..

Unless you're using BIG wire, odds are, for the same physical size, your 
losses will be lower with a separate matching network at the base and a 
capacity hat.  You'd have to run the numbers for yourself to figure out 
where the trades are.

The "wire around a structure" thing works nicely for mobile antennas 
(I'm using about 25 feet of AWG 16 wire wound around a standard 10m 
mobile whip).. it provides enough extra inductance to make the job of 
the autotuner at the base reasonable.
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>