| To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160? |
| From: | Michael Almeter <w4mja@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 3 May 2009 14:23:48 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Hello All,
I've got a question, concerning the inverted L antenna. In all the books
I've found, it states that one wants the vertical section "As high as
possible". If one had a 133' tree or tower, would it just be wise to run all
the wire vertically, instead of vertically and horizontally?
Thanks for the help!
Mike Almeter
W4MJA
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Gamma match, Norm Duxbury |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?, Henk Remijn PA5KT |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Wood constructed tower, Anthony W. DePrato |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160?, Henk Remijn PA5KT |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |