To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Shack ground |
From: | Mark Spencer <mspencer12345@yahoo.ca> |
Date: | Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:46:04 -0700 (PDT) |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
>NEC cares about "don't burn down the building" and "don't kill/injure >the occupants". Disasters like the MGM Grand hotel fire and swimming >pool shocks feature a lot in the discussions of code makers when talking >about Article 250. Don't burn down the building and don't kill / injure the occupants sound like a reasonable design criteria to me for the grounding of my amateur radio instalation. The protection of my amateur radio gear takes a distant third place to protecting the lives of my family memebrs and our home. Having a separate "RF ground" or antenna system ground that is not electrically connected to the electrical service ground by a dedicated ground wire would be a non starter for me. Regards Mark VE7AFZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] upper/lower/both box, Ted Bryant |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] SPG or whatever it is called now, to coax entrance ground question, kb2m |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Shack ground, Jim Brown |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Shack ground, jimlux |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |