| To: | "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>, towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 80-m. Inverted Vee vs. Dipole Performance |
| From: | navydude1962@yahoo.com |
| Reply-to: | navydude1962@yahoo.com |
| Date: | Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:20:00 +0000 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
When I had a secondary QTH for work Installed an 80m dipole up 100'. It was awesome though I didn't have a rotatable dipole to compare it to. The fact the rotable dipole is in the clear is what makes the whole difference. I have also compared my ladderline fed 80m against my 40m rotary dipole and the rotary wins every time. Go figure. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L Dimensions, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Free climbing a 1700' tower, Doug Westacott |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] 80-m. Inverted Vee vs. Dipole Performance, Jim Thomson |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Lightning Protection - Telescoping Towers, Mickey Baker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |