I disagree with Charles when he says that Robb, as a "5 lander" should not
be concerned about a court decision in California. If for nothing else Robb
should stand with all hams in the spirit of solidarity. And Robb should
also be concerned about court rulings being used as "set precedent" as I
am. I remember New Hampshire referencing a Massachusetts court finding to
deny a NH ham a tower permit.
Clint Talmadge ? W5CPT
-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Charles Coldwell
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 12:08 PM
To: Rob Atkinson
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Legal Issues
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com> wrote:
> It doesn't matter. The Calif. Supreme Court let stand without hearing
> the appeal,
[ ... ]
> Rob
> K5UJ
As a resident of 5-land, it shouldn't matter to you! The decision doesn't
matter outside the California border.
--
Charles M. Coldwell, W1CMC
"Turn on, log in, tune out"
Belmont, Massachusetts, New England (FN42jj)
GPG ID: 852E052F
GPG FPR: 77E5 2B51 4907 F08A 7E92 DE80 AFA9 9A8F 852E 052F
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|