To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 80M and 160M Matching Network |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Sun, 01 May 2011 08:56:06 -0700 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On 5/1/2011 7:29 AM, Gary Slagel wrote: > Its got the 160M coil at the base but I don't care for that system for 160 > because you have to manually switch between 160 and 80. If you use BIG coax (RG8, RG213), the loss on 80 and 160M is VERY small, even with a fairly high SWR. Unless you're tuning an vertical that's exactly a half wave, you can use a good tuner in the shack. I've done that with a vertical, and it worked fine. The Ten Tec 229 and 238 tuners are good for this application. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Number of radials and length to install ??, Jim Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Source for Stainless Steel Hardware, Bill Coleman |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] 80M and 160M Matching Network, Gary Slagel |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] 80M and 160M Matching Network, Bill Coleman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |