| To: | "Williams, Richard \(OAG/CPG\)" <Richard.Williams@gnb.ca>, "Towertalk reflector" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 90 DEGREE OFFSET |
| From: | "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll@arrl.net> |
| Reply-to: | Dave Hachadorian <k6ll@arrl.net> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:32:06 -0700 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
>-----Original Message----- >Thanks for the many responses. There doesn't seem to be a >consensus, other than get them vertically apart as far as >possible. 10 or 11 feet will be all I can get. I'll try it with >them pointed the same way and if that doesn't work I'll turn the >bottom one 90 degrees. Thanks again. >Rick VE9HF That's what I would do. Here's a procedure to test for interaction: http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-12/msg00333.html Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Big Bear Lake, CA . _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Why is a reflector preferred over director for 2 element designs?, n8de |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Why is a reflector preferred over director for2 element designs?, Ted Bryant |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] 90 DEGREE OFFSET, Williams, Richard (OAG/CPG) |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Windload, MailfrmPA |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |