Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Bazooka antenna

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Bazooka antenna
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:45:39 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
a.  So publicly advocating against the use of fan dipoles is not a 
"crusade" of sorts?

b.  You think bad key clicks and SSB splatter 3 db down aren't at least 
as easy to detect as a harmonic 30 db down?

c.  You think key clicks and SSB splatter aren't a far more pervasive 
problem than interference from harmonics?

We must be living in different realities with some sort of planar 
junction at this reflector.

Dave   AB7E



On 11/10/2011 7:06 AM, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>> I'd rather warn folks about REAL problems that are FAR worse -- phase
>> noise making signals ten times wider than they should be, key clicks,
>> and splatter from intermod distortion at both AF and RF generated both
>> by the transceiver and that garbage amp (or by a good amp that isn't
>> properly tuned). Yes, L-network tuners in a low pass configuration are
>> nice, and I have six of them on my operating desk, all tuning wire
>> antennas.
>> About a year ago, I added the Elecraft P3 spectrum display, and have
>> been watching signals -- mostly CW, but sometimes SSB too. There are
>> HUGE differences between the -50dB bandwidth of a K3 (about 400 Hz) and
>> most other rigs (often 5-10 kHz).  If you want to go on a crusade that
>> means something, tackle THAT!
> That's all wonderful but crusades with hams are usually counter productive.
>
> I submit that a detectable 2nd harmonic qualifies as a real problem
> especially if it is out of a ham band.
>
> 73
>
> Rob
> K5UJ
> ________
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>