To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height |
From: | Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@bdtv.se> |
Date: | Fri, 02 Dec 2011 16:46:12 +0100 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
With that criteria I would use a 90 ft tower. 73 Jim SM2EKM ---------------- On 2011-12-02 16:17, Steve Hunt wrote: > Of course! But the OP specifically said: > > "single multiband beam 40 - 10. No stacks." > > Steve G3TXQ > > > On 02/12/2011 14:59, K1TTT wrote: >> That's what stacks are for! >> >> _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] guys vs. falling limbs? Resp. by DAVIS RF Co., Stephen Davis |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height, K1TTT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height, Steve Hunt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effective Tower height, David Gilbert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |