Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] JAMAICA Antenna Question

To: David Jordan <wa3gin@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] JAMAICA Antenna Question
From: n8de@thepoint.net
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 11:40:50 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Dave ...
I think the F2 layer and NVIS are not "compatible".  NVIS usually  
utilizes the "D" layer, IIRC.
73
Don
N8DE


Quoting David Jordan <wa3gin@comcast.net>:

> Hi Folks,
>
> Now that the F2 layer is producing some good refraction I've got a   
> question about the NVIS Jamaica antenna.
>
> A few years ago I built this Jamaica antenna, basically four 1/2   
> wave wires or two full way dipoles fed in phase and spaced 1/2 wave   
> apart.
>
> It was a cold day in winter when the antenna went up. I cut the   
> wires to 70ft ea. and spaced the dipoles at 70ft. Used 600 ohm open   
> wire for the phase line and drop to the coupler. It was easy to   
> match on 40m.  The wires are 18ft AGL.
>
> The antenna works as claimed when NVIS is supported by the F2 layer.  
>  Much better than a dipole at 50ft for stations within a few hundred  
>  miles. I've always wondered if it would be worth the effort to go   
> back and prune the wires...
>
> The question is would performance of the antenna improve noticeably   
> by pruning the elements to resonance on 40m?
>
> 73,
> Dave
> wa3gin
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>