| To: | Jim Miller Waco Texas WB5OXQ <wb5oxq_1@grandecom.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] My dipoles |
| From: | Ken <wa8jxm@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:46:40 -0500 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On Jan 15, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Jim Miller Waco Texas WB5OXQ wrote: > I am still curious why 130' but I have heard that length several times and I > believe it is in the ARRL handbook. Because it gives you the efficiency of a full half wave dipole on 80m. Ken WA8JXM _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole fed with balanced line?, Ken |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole fed with balanced line?, Eddy Swynar |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] My dipoles, Jim Miller Waco Texas WB5OXQ |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] My dipoles, Jim Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |