Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Romex for Rotor cable?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Romex for Rotor cable?
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 20:47:55 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Instead of Romex, use UFB - rated for direct burial, so certainly OK for 
a conduit.

73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at 
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000 and
arcluster.reversebeacon.net, port 7000


On 3/1/2012 8:10 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
> A while back on TowerTalk I saw a comment that a nice solution for long
> 8-conductor rotor cable runs is a pair of "12-3 with a ground" Romex cables,
> which provides eight conductors.  I'm thinking of using this arrangement for
> a roughly 300' run in my underground conduits.  But I also spotted a comment
> that running Romex in underground conduits violates NEC code.  Is this a
> code formality or is there a real problem using Romex in conduits?  The
> voltage won't be more than around 30 VDC.
>
> 73,
> Steve
> N6SJ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>