Well, I took a really hard look at that picture and it's difficult to
tell what exactly that bar might be. The text doesn't describe it, so I
guess we'd just have to wait for someone who has seen one in person to
tell us. If it's sturdy enough it might keep the mount from spinning on
the leg.
I still think that the up/down torque would be a real problem, though,
and the bar would do nothing to mitigate that. I've seen my 100 pound
OB16-3 whip up and down like crazy on my tower and it doesn't come close
to being 25 square feet and 36 feet long. A side mount with leverage
like this one would most likely be just a really expensive shear pin
with that kind of antenna on it.
73,
Dave AB7E
On 4/23/2012 10:03 AM, Kelly Taylor wrote:
> Not sure it answers the problem entirely, but Dave, I noticed there is a bar
> that connects box to a second tower leg. That spreads out the load, but I'm
> not convinced that it's by enough.
>
> Curious as to whether you are still worried.
>
>
> On 4/23/12 11:24 AM, "David Gilbert"<xdavid@cis-broadband.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Very interesting, but that side mount version bothers me rather a lot.
>> No matter how strong the rotator itself may or may not be, I find it
>> difficult to believe that a single leg clamp like that wouldn't simply
>> twist around on the leg. People have such problems even when using much
>> larger clamping surfaces on two inch diameter masts with less leverage
>> than a side mount would have.
>>
>> Maybe more importantly, the potential rotational torque of a 25 sq ft
>> antenna in the vertical plane (36 foot boom trying to act like a
>> propeller) would be incredible ... not sure how it wouldn't bend the leg
>> of the tower given the roughly seven inch span of the mount.
>>
>> I really like the stackable mast clamps on the other versions, though
>> ... that's a pretty neat idea. Each is independent so the clamping
>> forces always add up, and if you need more area you just add more clamps.
>>
>> 73,
>> Dave AB7E
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/23/2012 8:31 AM, JoshL wrote:
>>> Geezzz, If you are like me , you have experienced
>>> many ROTOR failures over the years -
>>> from problems with controllers, direction sensors,
>>> to a SHAFT actually shearing off -
>>>
>>> W7CY has a new product , worth checking out
>>> The Control cable works fine at 500 ft length !
>>> It uses STEP motor with digital controller .
>>>
>>> this is NOT you Daddy's rotor !
>>>
>>> *www.cytorq.com *
>>>
>>> The CYDWINDER is side mount - with likely
>>> future UPGRADE to larger motor - I dislike
>>> TIC RINGS - hard to install, hard to maintain
>>> and tricky to climb around - this is a solution
>>> to that problem. One hardcore contester friend
>>> had many TIC rings at his old QTH, he told me
>>> " never again " !
>>>
>>> Check out the WEB SITE - you can download
>>> SPEC sheets for various products
>>>
>>> Josh N7XM Nevada
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|