Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Second antenna options?

To: Rick Kiessig <kiessig@gmail.com>, "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Second antenna options?
From: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:12:02 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
There's always a ground mounted vertical, such as the Butternut HF6V or HF9V.  
Considering that they are omnidirectional and long (in wavelengths), they are 
quite effective on 40-30-20m and will handle full power.

They work on the higher bands as well, but if you ground mount them terrain 
absoption becomes a significant factor.

Al
AB2ZY



-----Original Message-----
From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com 
[mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rick Kiessig
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 1:00 AM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Second antenna options?

With a tower in-place that doesn't have enough height to stack a second beam, 
and without another high spot to use for something like an elevated dipole, 
what are some good options for a second antenna that covers one or two of the 
same bands as the primary beam?

 

73, Rick ZL2HAM

 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>