Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:55:28 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I would love to hear from a concrete engineer type if not using rebar is 
good idea or not.

Mike W0MU

W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net

On 8/9/2012 7:30 PM, n8de@thepoint.net wrote:
> Rick,
>
> This may answer your question:
>
> http://www.universaltowers.com/bases.html
>
> 73
> Don
> N8DE
>
>
> Quoting "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>:
>
>> On 8/9/2012 11:24 AM, Jerry Gardner wrote:
>>
>>> Based on the specs, the Universal Towers HD-21-50 aluminum tower looks like
>>> it might be a better fit for the following reasons:
>>>      - * The base doesn't require a rebar cage, making installation simpler
>> What is special about the base for this tower that eliminates the need
>> for a rebar cage?  Is the base itself a metal framework that
>> functions as a rebar cage or something?
>>
>> Rick N6RK
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>