Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Fwd: 43 feet pole for vertical

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Fwd: 43 feet pole for vertical
From: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:14:01 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Can you tell me more about the pseudo-Brewster angel? I know what a Brewster 
angel is but don't know any problems with it for elevated verticals. A good 
link would be appreciated. 


Hans - N2JFS



-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Karlquist <richard@karlquist.com>
To: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Sent: Wed, Oct 31, 2012 11:25 pm
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 43 feet pole for vertical


Not a good idea due to pseudo-Brewster angle reflections.


Hans Hammarquist wrote:
> I was wondering if someone has experience with a 43 foot vertical, mounted
> on top of a tower. I used one before on top of my roof, but that one was
> supported with simple guy wires. Needless to say that is not easy to do if
> I put it on top of my tower (85 feet tall). Any suggestion? Maybe it is a
> very stupid idea?
>
>
> Hans - N2JFS
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>



 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TowerTalk] Fwd: 43 feet pole for vertical, Hans Hammarquist <=