Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Elementary Rx protection question

To: TowerTalk@contesting.com, Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Elementary Rx protection question
From: Avery Davis <wb4rtp@mindspring.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 22:26:08 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Pete
Many, many years ago, I used a separate receiver and transmitter, along
with separate antennas for receive and transmit instead of using a T/R
switch.  To protect the receiver from the very strong signal from the
adjacent transmitter antenna, I placed back-to-back diodes (I don't
remember if they were 1N914A or 1N4148A) at the receiver antenna
terminals, and this worked very well for me.  The receiver was a
Hallicrafters SX-111 (all tubes) and the transmitter was a Hallicrafters
HT-37 (about 100W).  I was pleased with the receiver performance in this
configuration.  Installing the back-to-back diodes was easy with this
receiver since it had two screw terminals for the antenna connections. 
Ultimately, I did incorporate a T/R coax relay so I could use just one
antenna, which improved my receiver peformance because the transmit
antenna was better than what I had been using for a receive antenna.  
For a more modern solution, you might look at an RF component vendor
like Mini-Circuits for what they have in the way of limiters.

73,
Avery, WB4RTP
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>