Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Station interference Stubs

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Station interference Stubs
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:57:19 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 2/12/2013 12:22 PM, Mike Baker wrote:
Stubs can do a pretty good job but for 160M the line losses will
kill you.

NOT if you use the right coax. RG6 is a bad idea for this, but a decent RG8 or RG213 with solid PE dielectric will kill the 2nd harmonic by 24 dB, See specific recommendations, tuning instructions, and measured data in the Coax and Stubs Q&A, link posted a few hours ago. I haven't measured the attenuation of 160M by a shorted 160M stub on an 80M system, but interpolating from other measurements, I'd guess about 25 dB.

The W3NQN filters are first rate. I recently finished a survey of all the contesting bandpass filters I could lay my hands on. Lots of measured data and analysis, as well as reports from several major contest clubs on reliability.

http://audiosystemsgroup.com/BandpassFilterSurvey.pdf
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>