Interesting. Is the take off angle the same for all three grounds when
simulated at certain height?
David
HK1A
EC5KXA
AE5XQ
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:01:56 -0500
> From: K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] dipole z vs height
>
> On 2/20/2013 12:47 PM, Dan Maguire wrote:
> > I'm a "visual" type guy, so I modeled Jim's 80m dipole at heights above
> > ground from 10 to 30 meters using three different soil conditions. Here's
> > the picture-worth-a-thousand-words:
> > http://ac6la.com/adhoc/80m%20Dipole%20R%20vs%20Height.gif
> >
> > If you'd like to play with variations on this yourself, contact me off-list
> > and I'll send you the ".weq" model file for use with AutoEZ.
> >
> > Dan, AC6LA
> > http://ac6la.com/
> >
> > --- On Wed, 2/20/13, Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Here's some sample data from a dipole at 3.68 MHz, with legs
> >> 19.646m long, copper wire.
>
> My 80m fan dipole which is 95' on one end and 10 feet on the other is a
> tad under 30 ohms , measured.
>
> The 40 m half wave center fed sloper is resonant at 7.200 where Z=402
> bur Z ranges 42.56 @7.144 to a low of 38.76 @ 7.000
>
> Top is roughly 85' angle is roughly 50 deg
>
> I don't have the fan dipole connected at the moment so I can't give
> actual numbers.
>
> 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|
