Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Grounding of tower

To: "jim@audiosystemsgroup.com" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>, "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Grounding of tower
From: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 11:51:00 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
________________________________________
From: TowerTalk [towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown 
[jim@audiosystemsgroup.com]
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 10:48 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Grounding of tower

On 5/10/2013 5:57 PM, Al Kozakiewicz wrote:
>> Actually, we CANNOT use the EARTH as a conductor for AC power either  --
> the resistance is far too high to carry enough current.
>
> Not true - see my prior post.

>This statement is in conflict both with physical reality AND nearly all
>building codes. 

Huh?  Much rural electrification was (and still is) carried out using the earth 
as a conductor.  Building codes do not apply to electric power distribution and 
are irrelevant anyway to your assertion that the earth cannot be used as a 
conductor for AC power due to resistance.

I2R losses are constant for a given current.  Raise the voltage; reduce the 
current and efficiency rises as the loss decreases.  Or keep current constant; 
just raise the voltage and efficiency also rises as I2R loss becomes a smaller 
percentage of the equation.  The whole point of all electrical systems is to 
deliver power (work), not current.

Al
AB2ZY
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>