Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns

Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 B-1/B-1S Baluns
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 13:53:15 +0100
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
If the choke is primarily reactive, and the coax braid impedance is also reactive but the opposite sign, adding the choke may *reduce* the net CM path impedance and *increase* the braid current. Making the choke resistive avoids that problem.

The choke resistance doesn't need to be "sky high" in this application - it simply needs to be adequate! 1500W into a balanced 50 Ohm load means 137v worst-case across the choke. Keep the choke resistance to 2k Ohms or more and the worst-case dissipation is a modest 9W. 2k Ohms is very easily realised over a wide frequency range.

73,
Steve G3TXQ


On 13/05/2013 13:30, Jim Thomson wrote:

##  why do they have to be resistive ??   Current squared  x  resistive ohms =  
lotsa heat.
Current squared  x  XL = no heat, or minimal heat.

##  If the balun is mainly resistive, it will work, but the Z has to be sky high, so 
you don’t cook the
balun.



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>