Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Crank-ups & Coax: to enclose or not to enclose

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Crank-ups & Coax: to enclose or not to enclose
From: "WK1W Ivan Shapiro" <WK1W@ivanshapiro.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:46:17 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
In this issue (TowerTalk Digest, Vol 130, Issue 74) there were references to
coax protection and one had a price of a component in the text.  

In a previous posting I noted that I used "split-loom", like used in engine
compartments.  I bought the largest size available locally and enclosed 4
runs of LMR400-UF, one run Cat5e and one run Siamese (RG59 + 18-2).  Not
only do they NOT get caught on the standoff rings (like they did once, and
that was enough !!!!)  but the jackets are protected against chaffing; and
against UV.  

Regarding remote motor operation vs. at the tower to lower:  It is
convenient in inclement weather to lower from indoors.  Of course I watch
the tower and coax, by using a remote camera which can follow the tower up
or down.

And BTW:  I mounted a PTZ camera atop the tower, just below the mast.  At 89
feet I get a good luck at the property, house, antenna and other wire
antennas.  That is what the Cat-5e and Siamese are for.

Anyway: HTH
73
Ivan
WK1W
Northern Maine

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [TowerTalk] Crank-ups & Coax: to enclose or not to enclose, WK1W Ivan Shapiro <=