Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149

To: Peter FORBES <prforbes@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RG-149
From: Dan Hearn <n5ardxcc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:10:04 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
My Times Wire and Cable catalog says it is 75 ohm


On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Peter FORBES <prforbes@bigpond.net.au>wrote:

> Mike,
>
> Isn't RG-149   75 ohm cable?
>
> Cheers
>
> Peter  VK3QI
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Mike
> VE3YF
> Sent: Friday, 13 December 2013 10:26 AM
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: [TowerTalk] RG-149
>
> Hi:
>
> I have a chance to pickup some RG-149 brand new for almost free. The
> difference from the specs of RG-213 is that it is 52 Ohm, the rest of the
> specs that I can find are the same as RG-213. However I found that it says
> it is low noise. Any one have any info on this RG-149 Coax.
>
>
> 73 De Mike
> VE3YF
>
> http://www.ve3yf.com
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6912 - Release Date: 12/11/13
>
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6912 - Release Date: 12/11/13
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>



-- 
Dan Hearn
N5AR
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>