Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Hustler 6-BTV installation

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Hustler 6-BTV installation
From: john@kk9a.com
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:17:57 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On many bands the 43' vertical would work better if used as a center
support for an inverted V.

John KK9A


To:      Towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject:         Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Hustler 6-BTV installation
From:    Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
Date:    Tue, 08 Apr 2014 17:43:37 -0700

On 4/8/2014 4:25 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
I just read the Joel Hallas, W1ZR article - "The 43 foot vertical monopole
- What's the magic?".  It was very interesting!  The coax losses are worse
than I imagined, up to 8dB though 100 feet of RG-213, and as my model
showed the radiation is very high above 20m.  Certainly a relay to
electrically shorten the antenna would help 15m and 10m.

John KK9A


I always wondered why someone would pay $400- $500 for a '43 foot
vertical' when you can hang about $1.50 worth of wire in a tree and do the
same thing.

We had one of those for FD and it was not a very good antenna.  73
Tom W7WHY

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>