I don't believe that there was any change to the swr curve or FB.
I believe that one of the Cushcraft Engineers said that grounding the
Reflector was ok. It might have been by someone who modeled it.
Mike W0MU
On 4/17/2014 9:04 AM, Wayne Kline wrote:
Interesting Mike ?
I replaced my Hi Gain 3 element with an XM240 and it's insulated
elements gave me no top loading for my shunt feed tower ( only boom @
DC ground)
Question ..... Di the grounding have any effect on the antennas Band
width or Front to back ?
Wayne W3EA
> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 08:55:53 -0600
> From: w0mu@w0mu.com
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] CC XM240 above a big Tribander
>
>
>
> When I was in Montana, I had an ungrounded XM240 and every time a storm
> would brew up you could hear the sprarking between the element and the
> boom in person and obviously on the radio. At night you could see it.
>
> I put a ground strap on my XM240 here in Colorado and I don't have that
> problem. The XM240 should have minimal interaction. Mine is 10 - 12
> feet above my SteppIR.
>
> Mike W0MU
>
> On 4/17/2014 6:26 AM, N2TK, Tony wrote:
> > Wasn't there something said years ago about grounding the
reflector on the
> > XM240 so it would work like the earlier 402CD? I can't remember if
this was
> > intended to reduce the interaction on 15M or if you had the
antenna at right
> > angles to a 20M beam the grounding would reduce a 20M resonance on the
> > XM240?
> > Lots of cobwebs in the belfry on this one.
> >
> > 73,
> > N2TK, Tony
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Bill
> > Parry
> >
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|