Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Guyed + self supporting /2 ??

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Guyed + self supporting /2 ??
From: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 14:55:58 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
You are right, Doug


When it comes to structures like towers you have to take in consideration the 
buckling effect. Just an extreme example; a long steel wire cable has no 
strength in compression but all its strength in tension. I am not sure what the 
story is with the legs in a tower.


Hans - N2JFS



-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
To: 'Hans Hammarquist' <hanslg@aol.com>; Tower Talk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Oct 19, 2014 2:41 pm
Subject: RE: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Guyed + self supporting /2 ??


Well you are going to have to take that point up with sdsc.edu.

"Metals like steel are elastic materials. Such materials are equally strong
in compression as in tension. ... when subjected to very large forces, it is
much stronger in compression than it is in tension."

Doug

I wasn't born in Saskatchewan, but I got here as soon as I could.

-----Original Message-----

Doug,


I have to correct one of your statements: Any metal structure, in general,
is stronger in tension than in compression. This doesn't change your point,
though.


Hans - N2JFS



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com




_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>