Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Is There a Good Balun...

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Is There a Good Balun...
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:25:12 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

I'm pretty sure that there is a lot of evidence, both empirical and theoretical, that says pattern is important when you're trying to actually aim at something or when you're concerned about interaction among adjacent antennas ... not to mention the implications for RFI and noise rejection that a well behaved feedline offers. But the silliest part of your argument is the bit about not worrying about "a couple of db", since the effects can be considerably greater ... and if a few db and a predictable pattern wasn't worth pursuing there wouldn't be much point in using anything other than a simple vertical in the first place.

Dave   AB7E


On 11/26/2014 10:48 AM, Wilson wrote:
I have asked my resident experts (U know who u r.) and added my own unschooled 
opinion.

For the three band range (20-10) it’s really trivial.
Going on down to 30 and 40 is only slightly more tricky.
The ARRL Antenna Book deals with this quite concisely and gives winding data for the 
“best” chokes for each situation.
Looking a little deeper, they say that if the coax goes down the mast, so it 
doesn’t pick up and reradiate a lot of energy (which compromises the pattern),
     the balun isn’t really needed.  So maybe someone will swing some patterns 
with and without the choke, for us?

My own take is that after hearing a lot of talk, much of it BS, and being exposed to a lot of 
colorful ads, we have developed a “need” that far overshadows reality.

And if the coax choke works, why on earth would one want to spend $50-$100, 
which will buy a LOT of beer, on $10 worth of stuff crammed into a little box 
AND four more connectors to get wet?
I think there’s a real possibility that the losses in the fancy balun, not to 
mention poor ones, may be more of a problem than the pattern distortion caused by not 
having one.

EZNEC is absolutely astonishing and a wonderful thing, but you can’t let it 
wind you up over a couple of dB when you are dealing with propagation ranging over 60 
dB!

Isn’t it amazing that the $18,000 Hilberling had to go back to the factory?

Of course this is a simpleminded argument, so it should be easy to show why 
it’s incorrect, right?

Wilson
W4BOH
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>