Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Fwd: [Bulk] Re: G5RV vs 40M dipole

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Fwd: [Bulk] Re: G5RV vs 40M dipole
From: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:19:14 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
What you really want is a choke with enough Z to hold back the CM current 
altogether thereby not burning any power at all. For a single band antenna you 
can do that with a resonance trap but for a multband you rely on some wideband 
choke that can be had to achieve.


Hans - N2JFS



-----Original Message-----
From: john <john@kk9a.com>
To: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Apr 26, 2015 5:09 pm
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: G5RV vs 40M dipole


Would you rather have RF coming back down your feedline into the shack
instead
of "wasting your RF power"?

John 

To:     Grant Saviers
<grants2@pacbell.net>
Subject:        Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: G5RV vs 40M
dipole
From:   Bry Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Apr 2015 13:51:01
-0400

First I have heard of using any "choke bead" for a G5RV. If it's

getting hot then it's wasting a lot of your RF power.

Best regards - Brian
Carling
AF4K Crystals Co.
117 Sterling Pine St.
Sanford, FL 32773

Tel:
+USA
321-262-5471

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk
mailing
list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

 
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>