Pete, I have the DXE RG-5000. Altho I am 60km from the nearest mw
transmitters, I have lots of mixing products across the low bands when it
is installed, using one of the Wellbrook active loop antennas. Before this
I used a home made device with parallel diodes and a small light bulb to
provide some measure of protection and no mixing issues. After passing
thru an passive 8 way splitter, signal levels are in the -20 dbm range
which should be in their stated "virtually RF transparent" area well below
its advertised -10dbm threshold. It takes another 6 db pad eliminates the
products. To use it on one of the low band full size dipoles here would
be impossible as they produce signal levels in the + a couple of dbm range.
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR <email@example.com> wrote:
> Do the DX Engineering RG-5000 device, or the AS-RXFEP from Array
> Solutions) behave nicely when hit with a signal well above their protection
> threshold, or dothey generate interference (noise, harmonics, intermod)
> from the energy that is blocked?
> Our particular application is for the RBN, involving a QS1R receiver very
> close to the antennas of an HF ionospheric radar operating on a couple of
> discrete frequency bands in the 8-18 MHz range with about 1 KW input (don't
> know what the EIRP would be at the location of the receiver).
> Dx Engineering says their version offers "far lower harmonic and noise
> products across the spectrum than any competing RX front-end saving
> device," Would sure like to hear some impartial confirmation.
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> Download the new N1MM Logger+ at
> <http://N1MM.hamdocs.com>. Check
> out the Reverse Beacon Network at
> <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
> For spots, please use your favorite
> "retail" DX cluster.
> TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk mailing list