Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] More balun advice

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] More balun advice
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:38:30 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Thu,11/12/2015 10:07 AM, Earl Morse wrote:

The first problem is that the word "balun" is used to describe at least a dozen very different things. Thus, one or more of the answers below sort of make sense for one of those things but not for the other things.

That said, most of what is written below makes no sense to me for any of those "things."

73, Jim K9YC

The antenna impedance won't change, it will still look like a typical dipole 
with or without the balun.

The balun will act like a transformer over a fixed set of frequencies depending 
on core material, # of turns, and inter-winding capacitance.  The high 
frequency limit would be determined by core material and inter-winding 
capacitance and the low frequency by the core material and # of turns.

# of turns and inter-winding capactance are mutually exclusive meaning that for 
the improvement you get at lower frequencies by adding more turns you will lose 
at the higher frequencies due to the increase in inter-winding capacitance.

A typical balun when terminated in its design load impedance would show less 
than 50 ohms at the low end of its frequency range, maintain 50 ohms through 
its usable frequency range, then go high when it hits its self resonant 
frequency at the high end of its usefulness.

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>