Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Guying Alum Tower

To: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>, n8de@thepoint.net
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Guying Alum Tower
From: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 10:53:33 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 12/7/2015 10:18 AM, Kelly Taylor wrote:
Given how much work and expense there might be in re-engineering the 50-foot 
Uni to 80-100 feet, are you maybe better off finding a use for the Uni at its 
design height and finding good, used Rohn for the 80-100 footer?

A guy is now advertising 7 sections of R45 plus a top section for $750. Can you 
do your extended Universal for significantly less than $750? Seems to me, given 
the safety issue and given the design specs of the Rohn, any cost-benefit 
analysis would have to significantly discount from that $750 to be worthwhile.

73, kelly
ve4xt


Steel tower weighs a lot more than aluminum and
being only 18 inches is less stiff, hence
requires multiple pull cables to tilt up, which
requires a falling derrick.  R45 would require
three levels of guying, versus one level for
my aluminum towers.

Rick N6RK
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>