Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Grounds, 'remote' towers, 'house' power system

To: StellarCAT <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Grounds, 'remote' towers, 'house' power system
From: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:54:43 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I recall previously someone made mention of using multiple single-point grounds 
when dealing with distant towers: heavy grounding at the tower, with all 
shields and grounds grounded at the base (as well as the top), and then running 
the coax and control cables to another SPG at the house.

Iirc, the thought was a ground strap, unless infinitely sized, would be, at 
best, useless over too great a span anyway.

I think the idea also was to put arresters at both the tower base and house 
entry panel. 

Anyone recall?

73, Kelly
ve4xt

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jan 13, 2016, at 8:28 AM, StellarCAT <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com> wrote:
> 
> I’m a bit confused by the push to connect my tower to the house power coming 
> in – direct of course ... but nonetheless connected. 
> 
> When I asked about ground rods from the tower legs it was stated, and I knew 
> this coming in, that the inductance of the line out to the ground rods from 
> the tower leg would dominate the response and usefulness of that ground 
> rod... ok ... that makes sense... but there we’re talking about in most cases 
> a strap – wide, flat, with few bends – i.e. an attempt at reducing the 
> inductance of that connection... but going from the tower to the house – even 
> for most where the tower might be 75’+ away (my furthest will be 300’, 
> closest 150’) – using a at best #6 wire typically (I know – there are those 
> that use bigger – I’m talking about the ‘norm’) .... THAT inductance is going 
> to tremendously influence the response. The current through it during the 
> “charging” phase – i.e. the stroke will be rising relatively slowly ... but 
> if the pulse is long enough and you get enough current in that line when the 
> pulse stops now the voltage instantly reverses going high at the house end... 
> if the connection isn’t very sturdy (able to handle the current with low 
> resistance/inductance) that voltage will be quite high. The connection from 
> the power company system to the house is – again – maybe #1 aluminum cable... 
> and it is often long as well... so IT isn’t going to add any low impedance 
> path either. The house thus becomes isolated! 
> 
> I’d think the best way to do it would be to seriously ground the hell out of 
> the tower – connect the cables that have shields including the coax to the 
> tower at its base ... but DON’T connect the ground to the house! I’ve done 
> this in many installations and haven’t had any problems. I do however 
> disconnect my antenna coax anytime I’m not on ... I know I know – there are 
> those that say “I never disconnect and haven’t had problems” ... but to me 
> it’s a simple ‘improvement’ to the protection level. And I’m not referring to 
> very large stations with 4 or more incoming coax lines – just the average 
> with 1, possibly 2 or 3. 
> 
> Also: regarding a previous posters “cone of protection” comment.... I’ve 
> always believed that if one has a good ground at the base of the tower and 
> the tower is a large conduction path – i.e. low resistance/inductance to the 
> top – then it will be more difficult to form an opposite charge at the top of 
> the tower. Other things like trees – especially tall ones which are not 
> overly conductive will more easily establish an opposite charge at their tops 
> and thus form a more attractive point of discharge for the lightning. I’ve 
> had tall towers – and as far as I know never had a direct hit to the tower. 
> Any issues I’ve ever had were power line induced – coupled energy from other 
> close strikes. 
> 
> sent previously:
> There is considerable confusion here with respect to radial systems 
> forantennas and an earth connection for lightning protection. They are 
> VERYdifferent, and both are important. Properly bonded conductors buried in 
> concrete ARE acceptable as a ground for lightning protection -- it'scalled a 
> Ufer ground, after Herbert Ufer who developed the concept, andit's now 
> recognized in the National Electric Code. A Ufer ground worksbecause 1) 
> concrete is conductive and 2) there is a large surface areain contact with 
> the earth. The downside is that the earth it makescontact with is near the 
> surface.Like ALL earth electrodes, it must be bonded to all other grounds 
> inyour home -- power system, Telco, CATV, your shack, and all driven rods.I 
> think Bob is on a pretty good track with his design.For more ideas, see 
> http://k9yc.com/160MPacificon.pdf73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>