Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] another subject: coax and cables buried or elevat

To: StellarCAT <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>, tower <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] another subject: coax and cables buried or elevated above ground?
From: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 11:10:57 -0800
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
This topic comes around on a regular basis. Lots of comments in the archives.

My approach - 1. water tight sch 40 conduit so ground water and muck stays out, critters can't (usually) get in, traffic doesn't damage cables, and I can add/remove cables. 2. direct burial sheathed (usually polyethylene) cables in the conduit so water can't get inside them. 3. unsealed conduit ends. Even though pressure and temperature differentials can allow moisture in, I think (hope?) it about averages out over a year cycle. 4. I don't worry about condensation. If I had an above grade low spot for a drain, I would have one but my conduits are basically level, and with normal trench depth variations there are probably low spots that wouldn't drain.

If you worry about condensation, then sealed ends and super dry air or bottled nitrogen or CO2 purging will work, just like very high power air dielectric coax. $$$$ The air needs to be dryer (lower dew point) than the lowest temperature ever experienced by the conduit. Sustained very low dew point purging is needed to make wet conduit and the contents dry out.

In theory an oil less air compressor and refrigerated shop air dryer would work if you are willing to buy them and pay for the kwh of electricity. My shop dryer is good for 40 d F dew point air at 150 psi which when expanded to ambient 14.7 psi has a dew point of -10 d F (I found an on-line calculator at http://www.dew-point.com/dew-point_calculator.asp) (an interesting fact - why wet things can be dried so quickly with a shop air blow gun, I didn't know that ambient value).

A good thing to do is check coax for loss every few years. A dummy load and the same swr bridge measuring power at the near and far end for precision makes that easy to calculate the db's of loss say at 10m.

Grant KZ1W



On 1/28/2016 5:22 AM, StellarCAT wrote:
My ongoing tower/antenna projects... hopefully I’m not boring others out 
there...

I had planned on burying all lines to the towers (2, one at 150’ out and one at 300’ out) ... at first I 
thought in solid joined (sealed) PVC which I can get for $9/10’ ... and I’ve also thought about direct 
burial which for the coax and control cables has the added benefit of increased capacitance to ground and thus a 
reduction of energy (lightening event) that reaches the shack... but control cables aren’t normally rated for 
direct burial... or at least I don’t think so (researching that now)...

Then this latest QST article on coax says DON’T bury in any type of conduit be 
it plastic or otherwise. It says condensation WILL get inside and ruin (flood) the 
cables.

So .... if the cables are underground – below the frost line – say minimum 1’ down (upstate SC) ... how will condensation develop? Or 
will it? I’m an engineer (HW/SW development) and reasonably intelligent but find it difficult to wrap my head around this issue... will it or 
won’t it – flood that is? if it were always under ground – including both ends then I’d think not.... but it isn’t always 
under as the ends come up to and above the surface... does that introduce a temperature variant enough to induce condensation? And I don’t like the 
idea of holes in the plastic – that just means mud will indeed eventually work its way inside.

Maybe use corrugated tubing (again – no cuts or openings) ... this would allow 
whatever moisture there might be, and I can’t imagine its going to be a great deal, to 
settle in the lower points of the corrugation.

Comments from others that have been through this - in the south with similar 
conditions would be appreciated.

Alternatively I could use a leader line and go from say 15’ on the first tower to the second tower and then that 
same level to the shack with supporting 4x4 poles along the way... but this seems iffy as well as first the cables are 
‘leaving’ the tower above ground potential so that might mean a higher voltage (common mode – 
probably?) on the lines (again: lightening type event)... and the first tower is a rotating tower ... although thinking 
about it that might work quite well to go from the tower with a ‘swing-arm’ of hanging coax/cables to allow 
rotation.

thoughts?

Gary
K9RX
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>