Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Tower buried section legs -- Buried in Concrete orBelow

To: k6mr@outlook.com, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower buried section legs -- Buried in Concrete orBelow the C...
From: TexasRF--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: TexasRF@aol.com
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:12:27 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Ken the only advantage is the tower can be stacked up to the first guy  
level without a need for temporary guys. Not a big deal but if working alone it 
 can save a lot of time. 
 
73,
Gerald K5GW
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 1/29/2016 11:31:06 A.M. Central Standard Time,  
k6mr@outlook.com writes:

Why do  people insist on putting the first section in concrete? If you read 
the K7NV  analysis of guyed towers it is far better to use a pier pin base. 
Less stress  on the tower and the problem of rust and/or freezing damage to 
the tower  disappears. Rohn approved. 
Seems like a win-win to me.
Ken  K6MR


> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> From:  patrick_g@windstream.net
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:55:49 -0600
>  Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower buried section legs -- Buried in Concrete 
 orBelow the Concrete?
> 
> What does the brain trust think about  the idea of plugging the ID of 
> tower legs slightly above the top of  the concrete foundation and 
> drilling a weep (drain) hole at the top  of the plug.  It would require 
> poking into that hole  periodically to prevent insects or whatever from 
> plugging the hole  but should eliminate the need for any concern or 
> proactive adding of  pea gravel below the tower legs or acid soil eating 
> on the bottom of  the legs.
> 
> Patrick        NJ5G
>  
> On 1/29/2016 10:40 AM, Chris Wynn via TowerTalk wrote:
> >  On my first Rohn 25 tower that I put up while in college, I had water 
get into  a leg and actually busted outwardly.  It left about an inch and a 
half  rip looking seam.  This occurred about 4 feet from the top of the  
concrete pad.  I could only imagine that there was some type of  obstruction in 
the leg that allowed water to build at that point.  When  it froze, the 
water expanded outwardly, busting the leg.Regardless, the tower  lasted 
throughout my college career and until I later got married and moved  out.  I 
would 
imagine that my father is still using that section to hold  up one of his 
bird houses.I would add that pea gravel as a way to drain any  moisture, just 
in case....
> >
> > Good luck
> >  Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
> >   
> >   On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Larry<lknain@nc.rr.com>  wrote:   I 
have always put the pea gravel in the bottom as spec'd by  Rohn. The way
> > the legs are constructed and assembled on G  sections I suspect there 
is very
> > little water that gets in the  legs. Probably more of an issue if the 
top
> > section is just  another straight section and the ends are not capped 
in some
> > way.  But I could imagine a very small amount of seepage perhaps 
through the
>  > bolt connections and perhaps over time rusting out the bottom of a leg 
 that
> > is sealed in concrete.  Perhaps condensation in some  environments 
could play
> > a role. The latter two seem awfully  remote to me.
> >
> > 73, Larry  W6NWS
>  >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry  Loen
> > Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 7:17 AM
> > To:  TowerTalk
> > Subject: [TowerTalk] Tower buried section legs --  Buried in Concrete 
orBelow
> > the Concrete?
> >
>  > The Rohn spec calls for the legs of the bottom section to be buried a  
few
> > inches in pea gravel below the concrete.  My contractor  suggests that 
as
> > long as the top is properly sealed, it's  overkill and that overall, 
it's
> > better to encase the legs in  concrete, protecting them from corrosion 
from
> > that rare day in  Arizona that the water levels would reach the bottom 
of
> > the  tower.  He suggests that the tower will be adequately sealed on  
top.
> > Soil here is acidic enough that I've been advised not to let  the tower
> > sections touch the ground for even the short time they  are stored here
> > awaiting erection.  Even if some got in over  the years, rainwater is
> > presumably less acidic.
>  >
> > I don't try to innovate in these matters, but I wonder who  is right 
here.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
>  >
> > Larry WO7R
> >  _______________________________________________
> >
>  >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing  list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >
>  > _______________________________________________
> >
>  >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing  list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> >   
> > _______________________________________________
>  >
> >
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> > TowerTalk mailing  list
> > TowerTalk@contesting.com
> >  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
>  _______________________________________________
> 
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk  mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk  mailing  list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>