Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] frustrating rain and connections... update

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] frustrating rain and connections... update
From: Gary Huber <GLHuber@msn.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 21:36:20 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
So if the SWR returns to normal with a towel, what would a gentle shaking of the antenna using the rotor to rock the antenna back and forth do? I'm sure some of those rain drops would drop....

73 ES DX,
Gary - AB9M

On 4/12/2016 7:02 PM, StellarCAT wrote:
An update to my post on rain and connections for those that might be 
interested...

I’ve had beams since 1978... I was off the air from 1990 through 2005 and when I returned it was in Arizona where 
rain is rare and when it comes, generally during the summer monsoon, EVERYTHING is disconnected. I don’t remember 
seeing the sort of effects I’ve seen with both the 15 and the 20 yagis here. And that I remember no one in their 
replies said “that’s normal” ... except one private email I received from an antenna manufacturer 
that asked to be unnamed...

he said indeed it IS normal and it is caused by the dielectric change with the rain acting as a covering 
(impartial and uneven thickness) and thus changes the tubings velocity factor and in essence lowers the 
antenna resonant frequency. That is what I saw on the 15 – not what I saw, or at least I 
wasn’t able to confirm it since my rig (and my license) won’t allow operation lower than 14.0 
which is where I saw the SWR’s worse change on the 20... I found it difficult to believe ...

so ... now I have the 20 on the test tower and the 15, now with a run of new coax (common 
suggestion – replace the coax, even though coax can’t change properties off and 
on in a matter of a few hours) on saw horses... it rained last night and BOTH antennas indeed 
saw the same increase in SWR high in the band. And both after a number of hours (about 5 
again) returned to normal.

So it rained again a little while ago and the 15 went up again ... so this time I went out and I dried all 
the elements with a towel. Before drying it I noticed that all of the elements had water beading along 
their bottom along the whole element length. Didn’t do a great deal – just ran a towel over 
the elements. And lo-n-behold the SWR returned to normal! This over a matter of 4 minutes from the test 
showing it was high to the test showing it was back to ‘normal’ after I had dried the 
elements.

So ... that to me is proof positive it is normal. I’m not sure why I don’t remember seeing it 
before – or why no one else mentioned it (many comments with many yagis/antennas) ... but now I know 
definitively that there is a direct relationship between water on the elements and high(er) SWR. [note 
– the SWR shifts downward so indeed it might lower the SWR on the low end of the band thus in that 
case being beneficial]

Thanks again to all that replied. (And my apologies for doubting! )

Gary
K9RX


From: StellarCAT
Sent: Saturday, April 2, 2016 5:03 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] frustrating rain and connections... also Noalox?

Thanks for the comments – it is a hairpin design. It is an M2 6 element 15 that was built using 
their 15M6-125 antenna and converted to their 15M6DX ... so I refer to it now as a 15M6DX-125. Anyway it 
has a fiberglass center insulator with thick donuts to ensure there isn’t any creepage along the 
fiberglass... and if it were anything related to that it should have done it when I hosed it down (lowered 
to 8’)... I couldn’t really get it to change with a hose.
Its off the tower now – had to move on (take advantage of clear days) to testing the 
20M5LGS made from a 20M5 ... its now on the tower at 8’ up with high winds so its not 
going up any higher until the hills are calm.
I’ll continue to test the 15 on saw horses. What I was seeing I’m sure will show even at that height. And once 
again: whatever design wise might be suggested it has to be remembered this is a near exact duplicate of another one that 
didn’t have this problem. So I’d guess it has to be either related to construction or possibly a deficiency caused 
by being used. The latter shouldn’t be a problem – I’ve dealt with used antennas before and never had a 
problem... but it could be. Please write direct if you have any other thoughts that come to mind.
Gary
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>