On 9/26/16 6:50 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
And they don't mention ERP except for the new VLF.
Wrong. The criteria on 60 meters is expressed in ERP. See 97.313(i):
(i) No station may transmit with an effective radiated power (ERP)
exceeding 100 W PEP on the 60 m band. For the purpose of computing
ERP, the transmitter PEP will be multiplied by the antenna gain
relative to a half-wave dipole antenna. A half-wave dipole antenna
will be presumed to have a gain of 1 (0 dBd). Licensees using other
antennas must maintain in their station records either the antenna
manufacturer's data on the antenna gain or calculations of the
antenna gain.
73,
And ERP (or EIRP) is probably factored into getting permission to
operate high power on 70cm (where virtually all antennas where high
power is used are mounted on a tower).
And, of course in the RF safety analysis as well.
I think the FCC has done a great job promulgating rules that are "easy
to follow" - stick a power meter in the line after the amp is "easy".
And the amateur service is unique among the radio services - it's the
only one with a "don't do this" as opposed to "you shall do this"
regulation set.
Safe harbor RF exposure calculations are similar.
If you want to do something else, you're going to have to justify it to
the FCC, should they ask. My contention is that ultimately, the FCC is
going to care about ERP, not whether the feedline is cryogenically
cooled superconductor or glowing red from the loss as your power meter
disk spins off the bearings. The power limits were created to manage
co-channel interference when ships and shore stations started to
interfere with each other.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|