Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Magic Length for 160-40 vertical?

To: "'Richard \(Rick\) Karlquist'" <richard@karlquist.com>, "'Kirk Kleinschmidt'" <sohosources@yahoo.com>, "'Towertalk Reflector'" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Magic Length for 160-40 vertical?
From: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:10:39 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I second Rick's suggestion.  I have an 80M dipole up about 80 feet fed with
open wire line.  On 160M I short the feedline together in the shack, and
with an antenna tuner use it as a top-loaded vertical.  

I plan to eventually put up a stand-alone vertical over a radial system, but
for now this improvised antenna works well on 160M.  

Only drawback is I need to avoid touching bare metal in the shack when
transmitting to avoid RF burns!

73,
Steve
N6SJ


-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Richard (Rick) Karlquist
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2016 8:40 AM
To: Kirk Kleinschmidt; Towertalk Reflector
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Magic Length for 160-40 vertical?

Tie the feed wires together and operate the existing antenna as a top loaded
vertical.  Forget about all the other ideas you mentioned.

Rick N6RK

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>