Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] spark gaps & GDT's for lightning/static protection

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] spark gaps & GDT's for lightning/static protection
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 17:25:34 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 4/9/17 4:01 PM, Roger (K8RI) on TT wrote:
Agreed, lightning is an RF event and the feedpoint is probably the best
place to start.

My thoughts on the direct path to the amp, were not toward a DC event,
it's just a lot easier for the residual voltage to traverse. I say
residual voltage as reducing the potential to around 300 volts, give or
take means a lot less for the buried coax to reduce.

An air spark gap will get you no lower than 327V.. 500 is more like a reasonable goal. An sealed gas gap can go a bit lower. And of course, there's semiconductor transient suppression devices.

 I'd also ground
the coax shield with a network of ground rods (at least three spaced at
120 degrees and at least 6' to 8' spacing) where the coax enters the
ground under the antenna.

Perhaps a spark gap (with fine points) at the feedpoint followed by a
gas discharge device where the coax enters the ground, lowering the
pulse entering the coax to less than several hundred volts and something
like a polyphaser where the coax enters the shack at the common point
ground.  The inductance and capacitance of the 100' of coax should
greatly reduce that voltage before it gets to the polyphaser/rig.

Actually, the coax won't reduce the voltage - it would depend on the source and load impedances, and if it's "matched" then it's just the RF or DC loss. 1dB would be, what, 12%...

Before the transient suppressor "fires", your coax is probably looking into a matched load (or close to it)




IOW, tackle it in steps, or stages instead of one brute force method.


Definitely. Clamp early and often.

Think about this, too: is it energy or voltage that's the thing you're trying to deal with - some devices are sensitive to overvoltage, others are more sensitive to impulse energy, so something that clamps the voltage might not actually reduce the energy, it would just make a short pulse into a long one.



For semiconductor devices, a significant over voltage (e.g. above the supply voltage of the part) typically results in some diode becoming forward biased, and the damage is actually from excess current flowing through the circuit. The traditional way on logic gates and such that have high input impedances is to put a series resistor to limit the current.

For instance, if you have a balanced line receiver (like for RS422) you terminate the twisted pair into 100 ohms (so the line is matched and you can send data at high speeds, then have 10k -20k in series into the megohm input impedance of the line receiver. 100V on the input through the 10k is only 10 mA of fault current, which typically is something that the on-chip devices can handle, particularly if it's short duration (milliseconds).
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>