Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: 160m T vs. Inverted L

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: 160m T vs. Inverted L
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:09:10 -0700
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 8/21/2017 11:53 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
hat is installed on the top of the 115' tower?  At 115' it's quite
close to resonant t0 2 MHz and any significant top loading (mast,
antenna booms even with insulted elements) may move the resonant point
down to 1.8 MHz or lower.  It will most certainly couple heavily to
the inverted L and will seriously impact performance.

Given that you can not get the vertical part of either a "T" or inverted
L more than 30 feet (0.06 wavelengths) from one of the towers, I would
expect coupling to be significant unless you can detune both of the
towers.

Good thinking. I'll add a very different suggestion that works for me. My tower is roughly equivalent. The solution I chose was to rig two wires sloping away from the tower to a feedpoint about 60 ft away. One goes to 70 degrees, the other to 270. They are suspended from opposite ends of a 10 ft length of 4-in PVC conduit that sits just below the rotator. The wires are fed separately at the base against 4 radials elevated about 20 ft. The tower acts as a reflector, yielding about 2 dB of gain. It's grounded, but I've added 8 on-ground radials to reduce its resistance.

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>