Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 402CD Modeling Help

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 402CD Modeling Help
From: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:21:44 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Brilliant Terry! Insulated elements are much easier to model. Unless you
want to  model the exact antenna that you have (and I am not sure how you
would do the loading coils), I would build it according to the manual.  If
you really want to improve the 402CD either swap in Hi-Q coils for the
little ones or make it in to a Moxon.

John KK9A




To:     "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject:        Re: [TowerTalk] 402CD Modeling Help.
From:   "Zivney, Terry" <00tlzivney@bsu.edu>
Date:   Thu, 30 Nov 2017 19:15:23 +0000
List-post:      <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Ted:

The Reflector is grounded to the boom in the 402CD
while the Reflector is insulated from the boom in the newer  XM240, I think.
So, part of the difference in element length is probably a correction for the
element mount.

Note that the Driven Elements are insulated from the boom in both models.

73

Terry N4TZ

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TowerTalk] 402CD Modeling Help, john@kk9a.com <=