Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Another way to make a CM choke ?

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Another way to make a CM choke ?
From: Máximo EA1DDO_HK1H <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 06:49:17 +0000
List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
To convert those Mag and Phase values to Complex Impedance (aka Choke 
Impedance) you can use next calculator (Excel spreadsheet):


http://www.puertobalsillas.com/radio/Balun_Guanella_4_1/Calculadora_Impedancia_Compleja.xlsx


(It is part of this web site: http://www.ea1ddo.es/medir_balun.php )


73, Maximo


________________________________
De: TowerTalk <[email protected]> en nombre de David Robbins 
<[email protected]>
Enviado: jueves, 14 de diciembre de 2017 21:48
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Re: [TowerTalk] Another way to make a CM choke ?

Ancient reference for aircore baluns:  
http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/airbalun.html


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:[email protected]
web: http://wiki.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://k1ttt.net:7373



-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David 
Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 21:12
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Another way to make a CM choke ?


I'm pretty sure some of the common mode choke approaches do exactly that ... 
except using the stray capacitance between the shields of the turns to get the 
resonance.  I suspect there are websites showing the right configurations 
(number and diameter of the turns) necessary for resonance.  It's been a while 
since I read Jim's paper, but I think he mentions that approach as well.

Dave   AB7E



On 12/14/2017 1:32 PM, Jim Thomson wrote:
> Ok, for MONOband use only, what about a simple parallel resonant circuit, 
> consisting of a solenoid coil of  50 ohm coax + parallel resonating fixed or 
> variable cap, or padding a variable cap ?
> With cap wired between input and output braid.  On paper, this appears to be 
> a  very high Z, and low Q device.  And wide enough to cover one ham band in 
> question.   Is it doable ?
> Whats the optimum  L to C ratio  for this concept to work ?   IE; we would 
> want the highest Z practical, but a Q such that the high Z covers an entire 
> band, or portion of one band, or freqs of interest.
>
> Jim  VE7RF
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>