Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Repairing/replacing a damaged feedline

To: "Bob Shohet, KQ2M" <kq2m@kq2m.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Repairing/replacing a damaged feedline
From: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>
Reply-to: wa5rtg@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:01:38 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I would make a trip to the CATV providers in the area and see if I could
get free hardline, replace it with something less likely to ever have a
problem, match the antenna to 75 ohms at antenna feed point and back to 50
ohms on the shack end if you believe necessary.

Less loss, less likely to get damaged by critters and free!

They gave given me dozens of reels of 3/4" hardline with 300 or more feet
on each reel.  A little sweet talk is all that was required.

73...Stan, K5GO

On Sun, Mar 24, 2019, 8:00 PM Bob Shohet, KQ2M <kq2m@kq2m.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Today I noticed that my 160 feedline which is a ~ 325’ feet long run of
> Buryflex, had lots of critter teeth marks in two main areas.  Clearly the
> coax in these areas is damaged beyond repair.
>
> Starting at the feedpoint of the 160 Inverted L, the first 25’ runs
> downhill and is pristine with no critter teeth holes.  Then they start to
> appear and run off and on for the next 100’ or so.  The is enormous damage
> at the 100’ mark – about 75’ from where they start appearing, and from
> start to finish, the length of critter damaged cable is ~ 100’.  This
> entire area is on flat ground.
>
> My understanding is that foam tends to wick up moisture but for how far on
> flat ground?  Can it wick 25’?  50’? 100’? The entire length of the
> buryflex?  I don’t want to wind up using and damaged or deteriorated cable
> but I don’t want to needlessly waste 150’ – 200’ of potentially good coax
>
> The coax run is ~ 6 years old so aside from the critter damage and any
> possibly wicked up moisture, the rest of the cable still has many potential
> years of life left.
>
> So my question is – should I just replace the entire 325’ Buryflex
> feedline?  Or does it make sense to replace the the 100’ damaged area plus
> an additional “safety” area of ~ 50’ for a total of 150’?
>
> Tnx & 73
>
> Bob KQ2M
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>